Rosetta emulation layer to run older PowerPC-only software, you won’t find many Get the same answer: universal binary/x86 support. Years about what they’re waiting for the most in Office 2008 and you’ll always
Porting Microsoft’s entire Mac product catalog to OS X, rebuilding Virtual PCįor the G5 processor (only for Apple to drop PPC entirely a short time later)Īnd now the latest stop: x86 processors and universal binaries.Īsk any Mac user who has purchased a Mac within the last two Of Apple, Microsoft has been along for Apple’s wild ride at every step and weĬan’t imagine a company that normally has such a strong focus on backwardsĬompatibility enjoying it all that much. As one of the largest Macintosh developers outside Very seldom will you find us feeling even the least bit sorryįor an 800lb gorilla, let alone the gorilla that is Microsoft, but this wouldīe one of those few times.
Moving to x86 processors, and a couple GUI style redesigns to round things out.Īpple’s desire to keep Mac OS X modern means backwards compatibility can take aīut what does this have to do with Office 2008? Practically This decade alone has seen Apple makeĪ major operating transition with Mac OS X, a major hardware transition in When it comes to software, Apple makes no attempt to hide orĮxcuse their breakneck development pace.
